IELTS Mock Test 2024 September
- Published on: 08 Jul 2024
- Tests taken: 50,176
Practice Test 1
NEW
Full Test
You can take a complete test for the Listening, Reading and Writing sections now, just like in the real IELTS exam!
IELTS Full Test
Simulation test mode is the best option to experience the real IELTS on computer.
Test information
- This test includes the Listening, Reading, Writing and Speaking sections.
- It takes about 3 hours to complete (same as the real IELTS test).
- This test includes the Listening, Reading and Writing sections. (Speaking simulation will be available soon).
- It takes about 2 hours and 45 minutes to complete (same as the real IELTS test).
Comments:
Anyone feels the reading 4 - section 2 isn't logical? First the passage seems like been extracted partly, the reasearcher's name of the key study mentioned in the passage isn't mentioned until the quite later part of it - quite confusing when "Ericsson" comes out of from no where without a reference before.
And at least two information matching questions are quite subjective in my opinion. I mean look at question 16 and 21, check the explaination of the two questions, they are just very personal assumptions rather than reasonable answers based on evidence from the passenage and logical speculation - at least these explainations don't convince me at all.
16 "While the passage doesn’t explicitly state that Gladwell extended the idea to fields outside music, his broader framing of "talent is irrelevant" implies that the rule applies universally, not only to musicians."
21 "Paragraph D discusses how Brooke Macnamara re-analyzed multiple studies, which could be interpreted as indicating a sophisticated approach."
Check the above explainations, and don't you guys feel they are super SUBJECTIVE? How comes something IMPLY something, or something COULD be INTERPRETED as?
Helpful
Anyone feels the reading 4 - section 2 isn't logical? First the passage seems like been extracted partly, the reasearcher's name of the key study mentioned in the passage isn't mentioned until the quite later part of it - quite confusing when "Ericsson" comes out of from no where without a reference before.
And at least two information matching questions are quite subjective in my opinion. I mean look at question 16 and 21, check the explaination of the two questions, they are just very personal assumptions rather than reasonable answers based on evidence from the passenage and logical speculation - at least these explainations don't convince me at all.
16 "While the passage doesn’t explicitly state that Gladwell extended the idea to fields outside music, his broader framing of "talent is irrelevant" implies that the rule applies universally, not only to musicians."
21 "Paragraph D discusses how Brooke Macnamara re-analyzed multiple studies, which could be interpreted as indicating a sophisticated approach."
Check the above explainations, and don't you guys feel they are super SUBJECTIVE? How comes something IMPLY something, or something COULD be INTERPRETED as?
I believe I got confused with the same part of exam.