[muhammed r] Writing Practice Test 408415
Task 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The map illustrates how stopbank could save the buildings from the water of floods. It clear from the graph that, without any kind of protection the flood can diminish the whole area. According to what is shown, the stopbank which suited by the river is consist of berm, floodgate, and freeboard. However, Subsequent to the a heavy rain, the stopbank operates as a dam to prevent the high-level water in the river from passing to residential zone . As a result, interval pone will stay low and keep the region safe. On the other hand, without a stopbank, the water will go up in channel and continue to the nearby houses then causes a disaster. This is because these homes were designed to sustain a 100-year flood level, but the height between the water and the entry of the house is merely 300 mm. To sum up, we could say that, this type of protector has a significant importance against the natural storms.
Task 2
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic.
Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is no doubt that these days many youths live together in a house prior to getting married. Consequently, a plethora of people claimw that this experiment has several benefits, while others find its drawbacks more than its upsides. This essay will discuss both sides and I will outline my own opinion.
In terms of the benefits of Cohabition, firstly, it enables people to discover partner’s interests, hobbies, and mentality. Consequently, the can draw an explicit image and decide whether they could make a permanent relationship to live together or not. In addition, this experiment gives a practical experience prior to marrying, so that, getting back is much easier and there is no losing of anything precious. As a result, the ratio of spilt up reduces progressively. To illustrate, according to the UN, young people in Nepal have the lowest rate of divorce due to the concept of living together for a while before getting married. This proves the importance of this phenomenon.
On the other hand, there is group of people that refuses this phenomenon. The prime reason given to support this claim is that destructive effects on the family. In other words, a number of youth partners may misuse this kind of relationships, so they live with partners for a period of time then change them rapidly without any intension to commence a real relationship. For example, according to authorities in the USA ,the vast majority of youths live with their partner merely for sex and the outcomes have risky impacts on the society. This is why some adults do not prefer to participate in such relation.
Overall, after a careful analysis of both points of view, I think this kind of lifestyle is beneficial if youths utilize it wisely.
Community’s feedback
Sorry! We couldn't find any contents.
