[Said A] Writing Practice Test 1152203

The line graph represents the number of oversea tourist visiting differents parts of a European country across the span of 20 years.

The number of oversea guest increase for both the lakes and the mountains. The mountain increased from 20 thousand to 30 thousand while the lakes increase from 10 thousand to 40 thousands both of which increased at a steady rate for the first 10 years. On the other hand, the the coast saw a decrease in guest during the first 5 years where the number of guest decreased from 40 thousand to 35 thousand.

The trend of increasing visitors continue for both the mountains and the lake where the number of oversea guests for the mountains till 2007 and the number of vistors for the lakes also increased until 2002 where it fell at 2007. The number of vistors for the coast had a steady increase from 1992 till 2007.

All in all, there is a overall increase in vistors in 2007 comapred to 1987 in all three areas of the counrty.

Some of the top athletes are favoured over their counterpart, the less achieved athletes by counrties where they are provided with top notch facilites while disregarding any less achieved person by not providing public facilities for all to use. In my personal opinion this should not be the case but in this essay I will provide both views of this issue.

To start with, the top athletes aren't necessarly the one with the best talents. They could just be well off and had a better opportunity. Meaning that athletes who might have a better talent than top athletes might not have as much opportunity. This will lead to less talents within the country and less competition in the field of sports. Therefore providing public sport facilities for all will increase the talents in the field leading to increase.

On the other hand, focusing on top athletes ensures that the country isn't wasting resources on mere chances. The chances that a random person with better talent than a top athlete isn't that high. Furthermore, the person with talent might be unintersted in that field. In addition to the country be more mindful of there resources, the top athletes might not have the best talents, but they do certianly have a talent above others. Hence it could be more efficient to develop there talents in specialised facilities.

All in all, I still believe that making public facilites for everyone is better than making specialised facilites for top athletes even though its has it's pros and it's cons.