Skip to main content

[Nia H] Writing Practice Test 1527248

Task 1

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

Writing Task 1

In 1995, people who were born in Australia chose for 50% lived in cities, 20% in towns, and 30% in rural areas. Meanwhile, people who were born outside Australia choose to live in cities for 60%, in towns for 10%, in rural areas for 40%.

In 2010, 65% of people who were born in Australia choose to loved in cities, 15% each choose to live in cities and rural areas. Meanwhile, people who were born outside Australia who choose to live in cities for 80%, in towns for 15%, and rural areas for 5%

From the data, we can conclude that the are some increase and decrease percentage of resident. People who were born in Australia and live in cities in 1995 and 2010 got 15% increase. Poeple who born in Australia, live in town between 1995 and 2010 got decreased for 10%. Between year given, people who lived in rural areas fall off for about 20%.

From my analyzation, there are transformatiion of people who were born outside Australia. People who lived in cities upsurge for 20%, in rural areas decrease 35%, and the same amount, 10% of towns.

As time goes by, people did some adaptations such as move to another living areas to provide their cost of living and supported by many factors that not given in the chart

Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

You should write at least 250 words.

I do agree of those statements. When rich countries give money for free to poorer countries, they will not get the essense of working. And it makes them to use the money as they wish. if the money they get runs out, they just keep asking for more money. If this happen for a long terms, they were like an old babies. Only accept and hope the bribes from richers/bosses but unable to search for themselves. And might be needy to others.

But if we do the same or similar or even better inovation like developed countries did, it will help poor people to learn new things, creativity and sell it to by their own way. So that, they can earn money for their own. The more they sell, the more effort they need. If it in gigantic order, they do need labor. Quantity of order effects quantity of labor they need, ends up they will have from small to large amount of job vacancy.

by this, they will help each other, each people of the country to grow together. Everyone have their own of mind, by this the labor can modif what they sell, introduce new innovation, sell it higher and earn better.

Poverty should be solved by critical mind not just one-stop steps. The developed countries does requires more time to succes for a long term. However, if the rich countries does the same as developed countries it build a perfect combo. Money and ideas from the rich people. Probably, rich countries refuse to do the same as developed countries because they doesnt want to build their own business rival

Score Given by Community

Give a bandscore

Leaderboard:

#UserScoreTime
Kento Nanami 8.552:31
Nayef Alhajraf 8.560:00
Ella Ruppo 7.559:39
4 chengxi yu 7.000:00
5 avin chui 7.059:11
6 癫 火 7.059:51
7 Li Xuefeng 6.503:46
8 Chanisara Wongkongsang 6.556:37
9 Dan H 6.050:41
10 Carlo Di Giacomo 6.060:00
Notifications
Messages