[Haritha C] Writing Practice Test 1401995

The bar charts illustrate the difference between the living of people during 1995 and 2010, whose birthplace was Australia and people who were born outside Australia. People were devided into three groups according to their living; urban, rural and town.

Overall, people who were living in the cities are higher than other two options, despite the fact they are born in Australia or not. People living in rural areas in 2010 were considerably less than 1995.

Regarding the people who were born in Australia, the highest percentage of people were living in cities with about 50%, while the lowest percentage were in towns which is 20% in 1995. While the percentage of people who were living in cities were increased in 2010 to about 65%, other two living areas lost their population and ended up with just 15% people.

Looking specifically at people who were born outside Australia, it depicted the same trend as the people whose birthplace is Australia, which the highest percentage of people living in cities and the lowest in town with 60% and about 10% repectively. Considering 2010, percentage of population in cities were grown up to 80%, while the population of towns and rurual areas were declined. Specially, the percentage of people who were living in rural areas were dramatically reduced to nearly 5%, which was the lowest in 2010.

Most of the time, the countries which are considered as developed countries help the other countries by giving them financial support to solve poverty. However these countries need other means of support from the rich countries in order to overcome the povertiness. I totally agree with this statement because of the reasons mentioned in the folowwing paragraphs.

First of all, poverty cannot be solved by just giving money away and in one night. It is a long and complex process that takes many years. Developed countries can do their favours to continue this process by giving different kinds of support rather than financial aid. One of them is, providing support to enhance the education in the country by providing equipments which are essenial for students such as books, school bags, pens and other stationary items. Additionally, the facilities in the local schools should be increased, which helps students to study in a better environment specialized for education. For an example, rich countries can donate modern facilities such as computer labs and new concepts like smart classroom to make students more attracted to studies.

Furthermore, the developed countries can support poor countries by increasing the number of opportunities in that country, which solve the problem of unemployment. For an example, the top level IT companies in the world such as Google, IBM etc. can start their branch companies in the poor countries in order to make new opportunites, which also help them to expand their business. Therefore these other types of support will make win-win situation for everyone.

To conclude, rich countries giving money to poor countries to overcomer poverty does not help. Therefore they can give their support in other ways such as enhancing education and increasing opportunities as mentioned above. Therefore I totally agree with the statement.