[Neha Lyka M] Writing Practice Test 1297502

The bar chart describes the distribution of people living in cities, towns, or urban areas, among those who have been born inside and outside of Australia has changed between 1995 and 2010. Overall, the trends show a decreasing proportion of people living in towns and rural areas between 1995 and 2010, resulting in the proportion of city dwellers to increase, while also maintaining its position in representing the majority of the population across the board.

The population of people born outside of Australia have been migrating to cities from towns and rural areas, increasing the percentage of people living in cities from 65% in 1995 to a whopping 80% in 2019. The proportion of people living towns and rural areas were equal at about 15%, but decreased by 5 and 10% respectively. In 2010, only 15% of those born in Australia live in towns and a mere 5% live in rural areas.

Among the population of people born inside Australia on the other hand, between 1995 and 2010 the proportion of people living in the city saw a slightly smaller increase from 50% to 60%. Unlike those born outside Australia, a higher proportion of people live in towns and rural areas, those living in rural areas make up the second largest proportion of people, and saw a 10% increase, from 30% to 40% in 2010. The proportion of people living in towns decreased from 20% to 10% in 2010.

I agree that aid richer, more developed countries is instrumental in the success and progression of poorer countries, and that this aid is not merely monetary but rather other kinds of aid. Although financial aid can be helpful in boosting the economy of poorer, developing nations, there is the matter of the way in which the money is used. It cannot always be ensured that the funds are being utilized appropriately for the success of the country. An exchange of information on the front of socioeconomic policies and strategies could better optimize the use of these funds. Lastly, policies, collaborative efforts, and interventions can aid in ensuring the country progresses to the point where external aid is no longer needed.

Richer nations are at a point where they they derive the benefit of decades of knowledge, honing down the tools of the trade, developing social institutions that set up their success. This has resulted in social, political, and economic benefits that benefit its residents. Poorer nations do not have the same wealth of information - in order to progress, they must navigate the unchartered waters that is presented by its specific geography, resources, political situation, and economic situation. I believe richer nations taking on the challenge to take on a holistic approach at developing the nation on all fronts is the best move forward. Having long-term goals that include programs targeted towards young professionals, governmental subsidies and regulations, and other such self-sustaining efforts, are some ways that can boost the local economy.

The philosophy is akin to the saying "Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he eats till he dies". Laying the foundation for an underdeveloped or developing nation for its path to success can be a long and dwindling process, but can be assisted greatly with help of all forms.