[Atharva N] Writing Practice Test 1204816

The graphs provide the insights onthe variations observed in the birthplace of people living in urban, rural and town in Australia between the year 1995 and 2010. There are two bar graphs representing the data of the year 1995 and 2010 respectively. Each graph is divided into two categories of people born in Australia and people born outside Australia. Each category is sub categorised into three i.e. cities, towns and rural areas.

In the year 1995, it is obsreved that the cities in Australia accomodated more outsiders than native Australians. While towns in Australia had more people born in Australia than people from outside. Rural areas had more native Australian than people who were not born in the country. In all, Australia has been a home to many people from different parts of the worlds in the year 1995.

Speaking of 2010, the population in Australia increased by approximately 20%. People preferred to accomodate themselves in the cities rather than towns and rural areas. Out of the people who were born outside Australia, maximum found home in the cities. The native Australians who stayed in the cites were 15% less than the non-native Australians. The towns and rural areas of Autralia had approximately same number of native Australians. Only a few born outside Australia chose towns and rural areas as their home.

In conclusion, Australia has been a home to many people from around the world. People migrating to Australia prefer to stay in the cities rather than towns and rural settlements as cities have many job opportunities. Comparing 1990 and 2010, many native Australians migrated themselves from towns and rural areas to cities in search of jobs and better quality of life.

Poverty is a global issue that needs to be solved on urgent basis. It can be a reason to numerous other problems like the country facing financial crisis, rise to number of pandemic outbreaks and what not. Many philantrophist countries help countries struck with poverty. But does it really help improving the condition? Not really! So rather than giving financial aid countries who are capable of providing some different kind of help might really be appreciated and could really help the poor countries to stand on their feet.

First of all, the developed countries should recognize what the poor countries really need. Is it money that they need or something else? Poverty can be caused by various factors. Food crisis, pandemics, wars, etc. So in such situations financial aid is not always an option. If the country is suffering from food crisis, providing food supplies can help them come out of the situation. Conducting campaigns acrross that country and supplying food to the regions where the intensity is more will help a lot. Helping the country to develope a strategy to overcome this issue can be helpful as well.

Another example is that if the country has a pandemic outbreak. The world has witnessed what a real life threatning pandemic is during COVID-19. Many countries and their economies collaped overnight. In such situations the countries were not able to purchase medical supplies and equipments due to financial difficulties. In such conditions rather than providing monetary funding, developed countries can provide medical supplies and equipments for free or subsidised rates. At the end, human life is all that matters in such situation.

So the conclusion is, money is not always the solution to eradicate poverty. What if the financial aid provided never reached its people? Corruption is everywhere and this aid might just fill the pockets of the corrupt government. Lending a hand to such countries is really important but what else is importat is that helping them stand on their own feet.