Skip to main content

[wijaya k] Writing Practice Test 1093337

Task 1

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words.

Writing Task 1

in my opinion people who born in australia and outside australia at 1995 must be more balance life,beacuse they live at city and rural area.

why like that? because in my opinion they must be had farmer that who live at rural area, not like 2010 people who live at rural area down drastically, i think that because people like now like entertainment so they moved out to city, they like jobs at office with air conditioning, at afternoon they can go to coffee shop, they have mall, cinema and something like that..

but i think we must invite people to live at rural areas to do jobs at there

thats important to

at towns i think thats still normal graphics for both of that.

i think thats all i can tell,because i don't know what the difference between living in cities,town,and rural areas.

and im from indonesia, when i get chance to live a life at australia maybe i will live at rural areas. hehe peace out.

Task 2

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

You should write at least 250 words.

i agree,

why? becasue in my opinion poor country still poor when other country giving away free money, instead like that, i think its going to be good country when rich countries give poorer country education,like students fees or something.

i think that will help much,because when they studied at rich country they will understand how peoples at rich country thinking, how they living a life, how their habbits, how their earnings money,etc.

and they studied like for 3/4 years and back to their country, they will give that experience to his close persons at least, they will start thinking like people who live at rich countries and maybe thats will helps economic arround their circle, imagine 1 rich country helping 1000 people for students fees or something,

they will make 1000 people start thinking, habbits,lifestyle etc like him

intsead giving free money, they will not know how to earning money, they don't have science to do that.

when their have no money, they will expecting again to get free money from richest countries

and, in that case too many possibilities to corrupt their money from governments.

so, i think giving students fees is more effective then giving money, giving them science is like giving unlimited money, because that will stuck on their head forever when they take seriously.

and i think rich country who will giving students fees must be still seeking who had potential at business, they must searching candidates slowly, who can take serious and interest in learning.

Score Given by Community

Average Score
4.0
from 3 voters
Band 4.5
Details
33%
Band 4.0
Details
67%
Give a bandscore

Leaderboard:

#UserScoreTime
Kento Nanami 8.552:31
Nayef Alhajraf 8.560:00
Ella Ruppo 7.559:39
4 chengxi yu 7.000:00
5 avin chui 7.059:11
6 癫 火 7.059:51
7 Li Xuefeng 6.503:46
8 Chanisara Wongkongsang 6.556:37
9 Dan H 6.050:41
10 Carlo Di Giacomo 6.060:00
Notifications
Messages