IELTS Mock Test 2022 September Writing Practice Test 2

Wwsrfwd. Gree

#Task#2

Now a days, cars are ubiquitous therefore some people thinks like that in solution of environmental problem, government should increment the transportation fuel cost. It would be great exertion but somehow prove to be bad initiative for middle or lower middle class. Below we will discuss all the possibilities to find best solution.

On talking about cons of the enhanced cost, traveling through vehicle has been becoming the part of life and increased fuel cost will only affect middle or lower middle class but not the upper class. In result, rich would travel easily through a car and poor would face cumbersome in it. This can cause inequality and in-justification in society. On the other hand, increased fuel cost can also enhance the goods price because huge number of industries are depending on petroleum and this incremented cost will also affect on them. So, it is not circuitous to implement sudden change. These two cons are justifying disagreement.

In terms of pro, reduction in environmental pollution is the primary advantage but in support of it, people start consuming petrol carefully because this is human nature that if you give something to him easily then he will not care of it. Some researching are analyzing this thing that, we are going to face petroleum shortage in some upcoming years therefore, we need to use it carefully.

On Conclusion, after analyzing arguments I decided to disagree with some other people who believes that high rates can reduce the environmental pollution. We have some better ways like reminding percipience and awaring people about environmental pollution. This may be the better way in environmental pollution reduction. The reason of not agreeing with this statement is, we can't force something on someone until other feel  and understand. So, we need to remind percipience in other's heart for better results.

Task#1:

Above given bar chart illustrating hours in number, which teacher spent while teaching to three Student levels
Primary, Lower Secondary and Upper Secondary in four cumbersome countries (Japan, Spain, Iceland and USA). Every
Country grown number of teaching hours with the increasing of educational level.

In overview, USA leading Lower and Upper Secondary Level with nearly 1200 and 1000 hours respectively, while Primary
Level leading by Spain with nearly 630 hours. On the other hand, Iceland has least number of hours in first
two levels (590 and 600 amount of hours respectively) and Japan has lowest Upper Secondary teaching hours
with round about 650 hours.

For Primary Schools, Japan investing 600, Span 630, Iceland below 600 and USA about 620
teaching hours over schools. While respectively Japan spending 600, Spain 650, Iceland 600 and USA
crossing 900 mark up for Lower Secondary Schools. Lastly, these countries paying lot of attention on upper
secondary schools with over 600, 900, over 900 and nearly 1200 spending hours in the same way.

https://ieltsonlinetests.com/wot/result/writing-practice-test-2-1128778

https://ieltsonlinetests.com/wot/result/writing-practice-test-2-1117525

Nowadays, environmental issue has become a critical issue for the well-being of mankind. The industrialization has brought not only huge opportunities for growth but also brought many problems too. There are many among us who believe to put a rein on the damage our modern life is impacting the environment, a price hike of oil for cars and other vehicles would be a good solution. I completely disagree with this idea and in this essay, I will support my view with examples.

Firstly, increasing the cost of fuel will not reduce carbon emissions in the environment in the way it is expected. Today's world economy heavily depends on communication and no matter how high the oil price could jump, doing business and continuing productivity, people will still be on highways and on air for economic survival. Although increasing oil prices might help to reduce our carbon footprint in the environment, but it would not address the root cause as we can not deny our economic advancement. On the contrary, if we put more emphasis on research and development in alternative sources of fossil fuel like hydrogen technology and hybrid vehicles, it might help us to accomplish our economic and environmental targets altogether. So price increasement is not a viable solution.

Another reason why I disagree with this is that if we raise the oil price it will obviously lead to inflation. Higher oil price means, the production and transportation cost will go high and it will eventually hit badly in the overall economy. For example, increasing jet fuel price means the air ticket price will grow higher. As a result, middle-income tourist will cut their travel plan and it would definitely hit hard to the tourism industry  around the globe.

In conclusion, although we can not ignore our carbon footprint and its impact on the environment, we can not impose indirect restriction on movemnet by increasing oil price. Personally I think, we should encourage alternative and environmental friendly energy solution and put our focus and research and development funds on it.

https://ieltsonlinetests.com/wot/result/writing-practice-test-2-1039140

This bar chart illustrates the number of hours teachers consumed in 2001 in multiple schools in four different regions.

Overall, in all four countries, the upper secondary is the highest category in which teachers spent time in it, followed by lower secondary and primary. The U.S.A. has the lead in upper and lower secondary at nearly 1200 and 1000 hours. Spain with approximately 700 hours is the largest in primary school.

It is clear that Japan is the lowest in both upper secondary and lower secondary at about 700 and 600 hours.

Furthermore, Iceland has the lowest number of hours consumed in primary school compared to the other three countries. As it is obvious U.S.A has a big contrast between the three categories, unlike Japan which has a moderate ratio compared to any other region.