IELTS Mock Test 2020 October
- Published on: 11 Oct 2020
- Tests taken: 159,376
Answer Keys:
Part 1: Question 14 - 26
- 14 agent
- 15 antitherapeutic
- 16 humanising
- 17 justice
- 18 actors
- 19 promising
- 20 creatively
- 21 relapse prevention plans
- 22 chain of events
- 23 high-risk situations
- 24 NOT GIVEN
- 25 TRUE
- 26 FALSE
Part 2: Question 27 - 40
- 27 D
- 28 A
- 29 C
- 30 B
- 31 light sleep
- 32 brain
- 33 smaller, faster waves
- 34 deep sleep
- 35 breathing
- 36 deteriorate
- 37 metabolic rate
- 38 torpor
- 39 day-night cycle
- 40 circadian rhythm
Leaderboard:
| # | User | คะแนน | เวลา | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disorn Chomchuen |  | 9.0 | 17:05 | |
| Huy Đứm Qi |  | 9.0 | 17:23 | |
| quan do | | 9.0 | 19:07 | |
| 4 | Nguyen Anh Tuan | | 9.0 | 31:26 |
| 5 | Crist Dat | | 9.0 | 31:46 |
| 6 | Mohamed Osama |  | 9.0 | 36:07 |
| 7 | Katesirint Boontan | | 9.0 | 39:30 |
| 8 | thái nguyễn | | 9.0 | 40:32 |
| 9 | Rahil Kotadiya |  | 9.0 | 42:26 |
| 10 | Nguyen Nhan | | 9.0 | 42:47 |
Share your score
Tips for improving your ielts score
WHAT IS SIGNPOST EXPRESSION IN IELTS LISTENING?
Signpost expression is something you must have heard of quite a few times before entering an IELTS test, so what exactly is it and why is it...
Review & Explanations:
Questions 14-20
Complete the notes below.
Choose NO MORE THAN ONE WORD from the passage for each answer.
Therapeutic Jurisprudence: study of the law as a therapeutic 14 and the therapeutic and 15 consequences of the law. Goal: the 16 of the law, but NOT at the expense of 17 and due process Applicable to: especially applicable to the role of legal 18 such as judges and lawyers Therapeutic jurisprudence = new attitude 1. It asks people to seek out 19 developments, not problems. 2. It urges people to think 20 and borrow from other fields. |
- 14 Answer: agent
- 15 Answer: antitherapeutic
- 16 Answer: humanising
- 17 Answer: justice
- 18 Answer: actors
- 19 Answer: promising
- 20 Answer: creatively
Questions 21-23
Complete the sentences.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
One aspect of cognitive behavioural treatment includes the preparation of 21 by offenders.
The treatment requires offenders to consider the 22 that lead to a crime being committed.
Treatment programmes encourage offenders to recognise 23 before they happen, and know what to do in case they do happen.
- 21 Answer: relapse prevention plans
- 22 Answer: chain of events
- 23 Answer: high-risk situations
Questions 24-26
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 2?
In spaces 24-26 below, write
| TRUE | if the statement agrees with the information |
| FALSE | if the statement contradicts the information |
| NOT GIVEN | If there is no information on this |
24 The use of rehabilitative programmes has been proved to greatly reduce the chance of a criminal re-offending.
25 Therapeutic jurisprudence aims to make cognitive behavioural treatment a part of the legal process itself.
26 Offenders might be encouraged by judges to take part in deciding what their punishment should be.
- 24 Answer: NOT GIVEN
- 25 Answer: TRUE
- 26 Answer: FALSE
READING PASSAGE 2
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 14-26, which are based on Reading Passage 2 below.
Therapeutic Jurisprudence:
An Overview
Therapeutic jurisprudence is the study of the role of the law as a therapeutic agent. It examines the law's impact on emotional life and on psychological well-being, and the therapeutic and antithera-peutic consequences of the law. It is most applicable to the fields of mental health law, criminal law, juvenile law and family law.
The general aim of therapeutic jurisprudence is the humanising of the law and addressing the human, emotional and psychological side of the legal process. It promotes the perspective that the law is a social force that produces behaviours and consequences. Therapeutic jurisprudence strives to have laws made or applied in a more therapeutic way so long as other values, such as justice and due process, can be fully respected. It is important to recognise that therapeutic jurisprudence does not itself suggest that therapeutic goals should trump other goals. It does not support paternalism or coercion by any means. It is simply a way of looking at the law in a richer way, and then bringing to the table some areas and issues that previously have gone unnoticed. Therapeutic jurisprudence simply suggests that we think about the therapeutic consequences of law and see if they can be factored into the processes of law-making, lawyering, and judging.
The law can be divided into the following categories: (1) legal rules, (2) legal procedures, such as hearings and trials and (3) the roles of legal actors - the behaviour of judges, lawyers, and of therapists acting in a legal context. Much of what legal actors do has an impact on the psychological well-being or emotional life of persons affected by the law, for example, in the dialogues that judges have with defendants or that lawyers have with clients. Therefore, therapeutic jurisprudence is especially applicable to this third category.
Therapeutic jurisprudence is a relatively new phenomenon. In the early days of law, attitudes were very different and efforts were focused primarily on what was wrong with various sorts of testimony. While there were good reasons for that early emphasis, an exclusive focus on what is wrong, rather than also looking at what is right and how these aspects could be further developed, is seriously shortsighted. Therapeutic jurisprudence focuses attention on this previously under-appreciated aspect, encouraging us to look very hard for promising developments, and to borrow from the behavioural science literature, even when this literature has nothing obviously to do with the law. It encourages people to think creatively about how promising developments from other fields might be brought into the legal system.
Recently, as a result of this multidisciplinary approach, certain kinds of rehabilitative programmes have begun to emerge that look rather promising. One type of cognitive behavioural treatment encourages offenders to prepare relapse prevention plans which require them to think through the chain of events that lead to criminality. These reasoning and rehabilitation-type programmes teach offenders cognitive self-change, to stop and think and figure out consequences, to anticipate high-risk situations, and to learn to avoid or cope with them. These programmes, so far, seem to be reasonably successful.
From a therapeutic jurisprudence standpoint, the question is how these programmes might be brought into the law. In one obvious sense, these problem-solving, reasoning and rehabilitation-type programmes can be made widely available in correctional and community settings. A way of linking them even more to the law, of course, would be to make them part of the legal process itself. The suggestion here is that if a judge or parole board becomes familiar with these techniques and is about to consider someone for probation, the judge might say, I'm going to consider you but I want you to come up with a preliminary relapse prevention plan that we will use as a basis for discussion. I want you to figure out why I should grant you probation and why I should be comfortable that you're going to succeed. In order for me to feel comfortable, I need to know what you regard -to be high-risk situations and how you're going to avoid them or cope with them.'
If that approach is followed, courts will be promoting cognitive self-change as part and parcel of the sentencing process itself. The process may operate this way; an offender would make a statement like 'I realise I mess up on Friday nights; therefore, I propose that I will stay at home on Friday nights.' Suddenly, it is not a judge imposing something on the offender. It's something that the offender has come up with him or herself, so he or she should think it is fair. If a person has a voice in his rehabilitation, then he is more likely to feel a commitment to it, and with that commitment, presumably, compliance will increase dramatically.
Comments: