雅思作文题目2023年2月25日雅思大作文：企业提供4周假期
题目：雅思作文题目2023年2月25日雅思大作文：企业提供4周假期
》》2023雅思大作文题目大全 |
Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
有观点称企业应该至少给员工4周年假，可以更有利于员工的工作。是否同意？
题目：雇主应该给员工每年至少4周的假期来提高员工的工作能力。在多大程度上你同意或不同意？
写作思路分析：
首先，我们可以讨论同意的观点。支持者可能认为，给员工足够的假期有助于缓解工作压力，提高员工的工作效率。他们可以指出，经常性的休假可以帮助员工恢复精力，减少疲劳和压力，在回到工作岗位时更有动力和创造力。此外，假期还可以为员工提供机会去充电、学习新知识或发展其他技能，从而使其在工作中更加全面和灵活。
接着，我们可以讨论不同意的观点。反对者可能认为，给员工过长的假期会导致工作效率下降和团队协作受阻。他们可能担心员工在假期后无法适应工作节奏，需要一段时间来调整状态。此外，长假期可能会使得工作进度被拖延或产生工作紧迫感，对企业运营产生负面影响。他们可能认为，更好的方式是通过短期的休息时间或弹性工作制来平衡员工的工作与生活。
最后，我们需要给出自己的观点。在给出观点之前，可以总结一下讨论的同意观点和不同意观点的优缺点。在给出自己观点时，可以权衡两方面的利弊，考虑员工福利和企业利益的平衡，以及具体行业和工作性质对于假期安排的特殊要求。
写作思路示例：
导入段：引入话题，提出雇主应该给员工每年至少4周假期来提高员工的工作能力的观点。
主体段1：讨论同意的观点，指出休假对员工工作效率的积极影响，并列举相关理由和例子。
主体段2：讨论不同意的观点，指出长假期可能带来的问题和困扰，并列举相关理由和例子。
主体段3：总结同意观点和不同意观点的优缺点，给出自己的观点，并说明理由。
结尾段：总结全文，重申观点。
写作时要注意使用合适的连接词和过渡词，使文章结构清晰，逻辑流畅。可以运用统计数据、研究结果和个人经验等来支持自己的观点，并加强论证的说服力。
雅思大作文真题及范文：
Title: The Benefits of Longer Holidays for Employee Performance
Word Count: 283
Introduction: The idea of employers providing their staff with a minimum 4-week holiday per year to enhance employee effectiveness is a topic that evokes varying opinions. This essay will examine the advantages of longer holidays in terms of improving employee job performance. Finally, a conclusion will be drawn based on the evaluation of these arguments.
Advantages of Longer Holidays for Employee Performance: Supporters argue that longer holidays can have a positive impact on employee job performance. Firstly, substantial time off allows individuals to relax, recharge, and reduce stress. It provides an opportunity for employees to disconnect from work-related responsibilities, promoting mental and emotional well-being. As a result, they return to work rejuvenated, motivated, and with increased focus, leading to enhanced productivity and creativity in their roles.
Secondly, longer holidays provide employees with the opportunity to pursue personal interests and engage in activities outside of their work environment. This, in turn, fosters personal growth, broadens their perspectives, and helps develop well-rounded individuals. The exposure to different experiences during extended breaks can lead to the acquisition of new skills, insights, and knowledge that can be applied to their professional endeavors.
Disagreement: While longer holidays can be beneficial, opponents argue that such extended breaks may disrupt workflow, leading to a decrease in productivity. They contend that shorter, more frequent breaks throughout the year might be a more effective way to maintain employee motivation and avoid workflow interruptions.
Conclusion: Overall, while concerns regarding potential disruptions to workflow exist, the advantages of longer holidays for employee job performance outweigh the disadvantages. Substantial time off allows employees to rest, recharge, and pursue personal interests, enabling them to return to work with increased motivation and a fresh perspective. Employers should recognize the importance of work-life balance and provide adequate holiday time to maximize employee well-being and productivity.
| 雅思口语Part2题库-2023年5-8月（事件类汇总） |
| 雅思口语Part2题库-2023年5-8月（物品类汇总） |
| 雅思口语Part2题库-2023年5-8月（地点类汇总） |
| 雅思口语Part2题库-2023年5-8月（人物类汇总） |
| 2023雅思口语模考真题最新 |
| 2023雅思写作模考真题最新 |
| 2023雅思阅读模考真题最新 |
| 2023雅思听力模考真题最新 |
| 雅思口语模考 |
| 雅思写作批改 |
| 雅思真题资料题库PDF下载 |
有话要说：
Some argue that it is better for student to study at home, while others maintain that traditional schooling is still crucial for students. This essay will essay will provide provocative insight into both views.
On the one hand, people in favour of the view that student should go to school are justified because of communication and gaining information. It is evident that school is a place for children to communicate with each others. Traditional school allows students to make friends and study together which are able to help children to gain interpersonal skills that will help them in professional settings such as teamwork and execute order. Another reason is traditional school are able to provide the validity of information. Students will have opportunity to access to comprehensible education through qualified teachers.
On the other hand, considering the effect on convenient, home studying is thought to be the most effective for children. Evidently, studying at home can save a significant amount of money. When studying at home, parents do not need to pay extra money, like gas or school equipment, and these money can be spent more hiring high qualified tutor for their children. More important, student can choose what subject that are suitable for them when studying at home. Some student might be excel at science so that home study can foster that student more about science and maths instead of studying another subject that are not necessary for them.
In conclusion, both views have their own benefits like traditional school can provide student quality knowledge and interpersonal skills, while home schooling can help saving money and allow optional subjects. In my opinion, I would recommend student to choose traditional studying because of qualified teaching methods but the best choice is the choice that children think most suitable for them.
TASK 1
The given map illustrates the existen ground floor plan and furthermore a proposed plan for some building work. The ground floor consist of two main rooms, stairs and so on.
That is clear to see that the proposed plan of ground floor is a little different from the existing one.
The kichen and the living room in existen ground floor is similar to the ones in proposed plan. The living room has no change whereas the kichen has a little change that it adds some kitchen furniture. In addition, there is no change of two entrance doors .
Although the kitchen, the living room and entrance doors, other things have plenty of changes. The hall is removed in the proposed plan map and an internal door on the right as well. The two internal doors are changed position in proposed plan map , existing ground floor plan's ones are on two side, but in proposed plan map, they are just on the left. Moreover, the stairs in existing ground floor plan and ones
in proposed plan has difference in the structure.
TASK 2
In this age, people are caring more and more about the way to teach children. Therefore, a lot of forums and debates are created to discuss about how to teach children. Someone has belief that teaching children at home is best for a child's development whereas others give thought that it is crucial for children to go to school. The following paragraphs discuss whether teaching children at home or making children go to school is better for a child's development and reach a reasonable conclusion.
On the one hand, teaching children at home is good for children's development because children can study with their parents. Therefore, the children can have more knowledge, they also avoid being bullied and develop their family loving as well. In addition, teaching children at home makes children more comfortable thus they study at home where they grew up. Moreover, the parents are who born them, so when they teach their children, they know what their children need to enhance.
On the other hand, making children go to school is good for a child's growth because they are tough by experienced teachers. Hence, children can have the enhencement of knowledge. Besides, they can make plenty of friends, so they feel happier. In addition, they can learn specialized subjects which are extremly important for their future. Furthermore, they also can learn physical education which is so good for children's health. Moreover, when children go
to school mean they take part in the scociety, so they will be more confident in the future.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that making children go to school is better for a child's development. Because the advantages of teaching children at home are children's safe and the improvement of family loving pale into insignfication comparation to the advantages of making children go to school are the confidence, better future and strong health.
Some argue that it is better for student to study at home, while others maintain that traditional schooling is still crucial for students. This essay will essay will provide provocative insight into both views.
On the one hand, people in favour of the view that student should go to school are justified because of communication and gaining information. It is evident that school is a place for children to communicate with each others. Traditional school allows students to make friends and study together which are able to help children to gain interpersonal skills that will help them in professional settings such as teamwork and execute order. Another reason is traditional school are able to provide the validity of information. Students will have opportunity to access to comprehensible education through qualified teachers.
On the other hand, considering the effect on convenient, home studying is thought to be the most effective for children. Evidently, studying at home can save a significant amount of money. When studying at home, parents do not need to pay extra money, like gas or school equipment, and these money can be spent more hiring high qualified tutor for their children. More important, student can choose what subject that are suitable for them when studying at home. Some student might be excel at science so that home study can foster that student more about science and maths instead of studying another subject that are not necessary for them.
In conclusion, both views have their own benefits like traditional school can provide student quality knowledge and interpersonal skills, while home schooling can help saving money and allow optional subjects. In my opinion, I would recommend student to choose traditional studying because of qualified teaching methods but the best choice is the choice that children think most suitable for them.
We also know that we can't live alone during our life. We need family, friends and social relationship for mental life and for our improvement. So children is the same.
The first advantage of letting children go to school is children need to learn many things from many sources. It must be better than only one source from family. The knowledge is not limited so the source to learn is not limited. Learning at family is limited by some familiar sources like parents, brothers, sisters. Children can not change these sources. However, teachers at school are changes by subjects and class level every years.
The second advantage is that beside knowledge, children can learn how to express their emotion and learn how to receive and deal with emotion from outside their family. This is what family can not do better than school with children's friends, teachers and even other people they will meet everyday such as the cleaners, doorkeepers, drivers.
Finally the third advantage is I am talking about conditions for leaning such as toy, books, music and other new and interesting things. These are easily updated time to time and every year. Family can not buy many things and change so many time or change right after children feel boring. Remember that children need some thing new every day. That is childen's curious instinct. Family find difficult to supply diversity tools for children to learn if we compare school and family.
However, everythings has other side. Bad classmates, bad teachers, violences or other bad matters may occur everywhere. Our mission to the children is that we should know how to protect our children on time.
The proposed changes of a house focus on the stairs and the walk flow from the stairs to kitchen and from the stairs to the living room.
First, we take a look at the new design of the stair. The proposed design changes the shape of the stair from the straight to curve shape. Two internal doors and the storage under stairs are replaced by the larger stairs with curve shape. Insteads, the proposed plan opens a new internal door at the entrance door of living room. It means at the the entrance of the house, people can move to kitchen or living room faster than the existing design.
Second, at the proposed plan, in order to prevent cooking smell from kitchen to travel to the rest area of the house, an internal door is the best solution.
Generally, the new design at the proposed plan is more convinent than the existing design. Morever, the new design is also look more beautiful.
The space of the house is a condition that helps the house become more spacious and airy.
Therefore, to create an airy space for the house, we propose some of changes in the design to help the ground floor become livelier.
First, we will move the internal door to new position. We will install a double door on the left behind of entrance door to come to Kitchen.
Second, we remove the right wall and internal door come to Living Room. This will make the living room space is bigger, it is transparent with the kitchen when the door is open and separate when it closed.
Next, The stairs change to new position, new design to a U-shape to save space, giving the living room an expansion more of the space. No current Hall due to the right wall is removed and Store under stair too
It will help the house have a more living space and modern.
Finally, the kitchen space is improved by adding a kitchen cabinets and furniture, making the kitchen save space and convenient.
We hope, with the proposed design modifications, will make the house modern, and spacious. Help the owner's living space be more satisfied.
Thank you.
The given maps illustrate the current floor design of a house and the suggested modifications for the construction.
Overall, the plan witnesses some radical changes with the most noticeable being the floor center. While the disappearance of the internal wall on the right seems to expand the living room space, the kitchen on the left looks narrowed with the additional furniture.
Looking at the existing plan, the entrance door directs to the central hall of the floor, with the stairs located on the right. In the future, the internal wall between the living room and the main hall will be removed, accompanied by the relocation of the stairs.
Regarding the left of the design, although the kitchen at present connects with the hall through an internal door at the back, there will be a double door on the right of the entrance instead of a single one. Furthermore, a part of the kitchen will be specifically used for additional furniture in the future.
Task 1: Pls
Overall, the plan witnesses some radical changes with the most noticeable being the floor center. While the disappearance of the internal wall on the right seems to expand the living room space, the kitchen on the left looks narrowed with the additional furniture.
Looking at the existing plan, the entrance door directs to the central hall of the floor, with the stairs located on the right. In the future, the internal wall between the living room and the main hall will be removed, accompanied by the relocation of the stairs.
Regarding the left of the design, although the kitchen at present connects with the hall through an internal door at the back, there will be a double door on the right of the entrance instead of a single one. Furthermore, a part of the kitchen will be specifically used for additional furniture in the future.
The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The maps illustrate a proposed change for ground floor work of a house.
First of all, there will be kitchen furniture added in the kitchen on the west wing. There is an internal door on the top right side of the kitchen near the west entrance door, and an internal wall the right which separates the kitchen and the hall. The internal door will be changed to double doors and moved to the bottom right side, near the south entrance door.
Secondly, the stairs in the hall will be altered to spiral stairs which is bigger than the previous one. The storage under the stairs will be removed to free up some space needed for the spiral stairs. The internal wall and the internal door separating the hall and the living room on the right side will be removed. As a result, the hall will be no longer there because it is merged with the living room.
Some argue that it is better for student to study at home, while others maintain that traditional schooling is still crucial for students. This essay will essay will provide provocative insight into both views.
On the one hand, people in favour of the view that student should go to school are justified because of communication and gaining information. It is evident that school is a place for children to communicate with each others. Traditional school allows students to make friends and study together which are able to help children to gain interpersonal skills that will help them in professional settings such as teamwork and execute order. Another reason is traditional school are able to provide the validity of information. Students will have opportunity to access to comprehensible education through qualified teachers.
On the other hand, considering the effect on convenient, home studying is thought to be the most effective for children. Evidently, studying at home can save a significant amount of money. When studying at home, parents do not need to pay extra money, like gas or school equipment, and these money can be spent more hiring high qualified tutor for their children. More important, student can choose what subject that are suitable for them when studying at home. Some student might be excel at science so that home study can foster that student more about science and maths instead of studying another subject that are not necessary for them.
In conclusion, both views have their own benefits like traditional school can provide student quality knowledge and interpersonal skills, while home schooling can help saving money and allow optional subjects. In my opinion, I would recommend student to choose traditional studying because of qualified teaching methods but the best choice is the choice that children think most suitable for them.
Thanks for great essay with lots of terrific words and phrases
There are 2 incorrect words:
This essay will provide (not will essay)
Some student might be excellent (adj)